Legal Opinion

Adorno v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 1, 2012No. A11A2272, A11A2273PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dillard, Judge.

Following a jury trial, Sheila Adorno was convicted on two counts of cruelty to children in the first degree, and her co-defendant, Mercedes Ramirez (collectively “defendants”), was convicted on four counts of child molestation. Both appeal their convictions and the denial of their respective motions for new trial. Adorno challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting her convictions, and Ramirez contends that the trial court erred in reopening the evidence after closing arguments were completed and in denying his claim that his trial counsel provided ineffective…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  4. Chapman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  5. English v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Best v. CB Decatur Court, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  2. LANHAM v. the STATE.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
  3. Traylor v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
  4. Hillsman v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
  5. Morast v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API