Chestang v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HARWOOD, Presiding Judge.
These appellants have been found guilty by the court below of the offense of taking, catching, or killing, between the hours of sunset and daylight, an animal protected by the laws of Alabama. In common parlance such offense is called night hunting.
These appellants were tried jointly in the court below, and separate judgments were entered as to each, and each has attempted an appeal from such respective judgments.
The evidence being the same in each case, the appeals were joined in a single transcript of the evidence.
The Attorney General has filed a motion to strike…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Relf v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- Lane v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1956
- Tipton v. TiptonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- Sheiner v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nettles v. NettlesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
- Denson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1966
- Smith v. StewartAlabama Court of Appeals · 1961