Legal Opinion

United States v. F. W. Woolworth Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 2, 1932No. 3496Published

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States Customs Court.

Merchandise, consisting of so-called spring daggers, was assessed for duty by the collector at the port of New York as toys at 70 per *63centum ad valorem under paragraph 1513 of the Tariff Act of 1930, the pertinent part of which reads as follows:

* * * and all other toys, and parts of toys, not specially provided for, 70 per centum ad valorem. As used in this paragraph the term “toy” means an article chiefly used for the amusement of children, whether or not also suitable for physical exercise or for mental development. The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. American Express Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API