Legal Opinion

Southern Building & Loan Ass'n v. Holmes

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 27, 1933No. 8 Div. 483PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, Justice.

On the trial of the above-stated cause, the court refused, upon written request of defend ant, to instruct the jury in the language of the following charge: “22. I charge you, gentlemen of the jury, that if you are not reasonably satisfied from the evidence that the fraud practiced upon plaintiff, if you find there was fraud, was malicious, oppressive, or gross, and that the representations made were made with a knowledge of their falsity on the part of the defendant’s agent (or so recklessly made as to amount to the same thing), and with the purpose of injuring the plaintiff,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Riley v. RileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1860
  2. Whitsett v. BelueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  3. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  4. Barlow v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  5. Doe, ex dem. Anniston City Land Co v. EdmondsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,189 First Virginia Bankshares v. Alan BensonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
  2. First Alabama Bank Of Montgomery, N.A. v. First State Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  3. Sparks v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  4. First Alabama Bank of Montgomery, N.A. v. First State InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  5. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API