State, Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Peacock
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
Petitioner, the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles (“Department”), seeks certiorari review of the trial court’s Order on Motion to Stay, arguing that the trial court departed from- the essential requirements of law by staying Respondent’s dismissal from a Special Supervision Services Program and the cancellation of his hardship or restricted driver’s license. For the following reasons, we deny the certiorari petition.
The Department permanently revoked the driving privilege of Respondent, Wallace Peacock, in 1992 as a result of various drivmg-under-the-influence offenses. In 2003,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Leisure Resorts, Inc. v. Frank J. Rooney, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1995
- STATE, DEPT. OF HWY. SAFETY v. DegrossiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Anderson v. Department of Highway Safety & Motor VehiclesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Caceres v. Sedano's SupermarketsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. OlivieDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.