Leary v. Aero Mayflower Transit Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Judge.
Plaintiffs first argue that certain evidence was erroneously excluded. The record does not show what the question was, so we cannot know whether the objection was to the form of a question, the content of a question, or the form or content of an answer or attempted answer. It is of no consequence, however, for the contention is without merit. Plaintiffs’ counsel apparently had inquired of the femme plaintiff whether she had pointed out to the defendant’s representative anything unusual about their property as distinguishable from household goods generally. The witness responded…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Reider v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Calveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. WoodburySupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Southern Pacific Railroad Co. of Mexico v. GonzalezArizona Supreme Court · 1936
- Alwine v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. Elmore & StahlCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Zarn, Inc. v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Kenny's Auto Parts, Inc. v. BakerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
- Zarn, Inc. v. Southern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981