Harrelson v. Wild Adventures, Inc.

Blackburn, Presiding Judge.

In this personal injury action, Trena Harrelson appeals the grant of summary judgment to Wild Adventures, Inc., arguing both that genuine issues of material fact exist and that she was entitled to an inference of negligence on the part of Wild Adventures through application of the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur. Finding no merit to these contentions, we affirm.

Summary judgment is appropriate when there are no genuine issues of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. In reviewing a trial court’s ruling on a motion for summary judgment,…