Commonwealth v. Nole
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER OF COURT
2Per curiam
The Court being equally divided, the Order of the Superi- or Court is affirmed.
McDERMOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case. ZAPPALA, J., filed an Opinion in Support of Affirmance in which NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, J., joined. FLAHERTY, J., filed an Opinion in Support of Reversal in which HUTCHINSON and PAPADAKOS, JJ., joined.
OPINION IN SUPPORT OF REVERSAL
FLAHERTY, Justice.
The trial court determined after reviewing the instant pro se petition that the issues presented in this, Nole’s third petition under the Post Conviction Hearing Act, Act of…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Commonwealth v. HubbardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. WatlingtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. FinleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. NoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
4Cited by5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WalkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. SawyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. FullerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. SawyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986