Legal Opinion

Latham

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 17, 1924PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.

The brief of the appellant is prepared upon the conception, that the statute in force at the time a child is adopted, rather than that passing and distributing the estate of an adoptive father subsequently dying intestate, determines whether the child is capable of talcing the relation of an inheritor to the personal property that the parent left. The rule is otherwise.

In the early 60s, when Seward M. Latham adopted George M. Latham, by decree of the Probate Court in Cumberland county, the inherent capacity of succession or inheritance did not arise from that relation. By the statute then…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gilliam v. . Guaranty Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. Sorenson v. RasmussenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. New England Trust Company v. SangerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1955
  2. Brooks Bank & Trust Co. v. RorabacherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  3. Copeland v. State Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
  4. Employees' Retirement System of Territory v. ChangHawaii Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Fulcher v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API