Legal Opinion

Barnoski v. Village of Broadalbin

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1982Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Thomas E. Mercure, J.

Defendant, Village of Broadalbin, New York, seeks judgment, pursuant to CPLR 9804, on the ground of noncompliance by the plaintiffs with the required condition precedent mandated in the statute.

Plaintiffs allege that plaintiff Wanda Barnoski was injured when she fell in a hole on First Avenue, in the Village of Broadalbin, New York. Defendant, Village of Broadalbin, answered with a general denial and set forth as an affirmative defense the failure to comply with CPLR 9804.

“§ 9804. Notice of defects in certain actions.
“No civil action shall be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Muszynski v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
  2. Appelbaum v. City of Long BeachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
  3. Kotler v. City of Long BeachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  4. Slater v. Town of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  5. Adler v. Village of Saranac LakeNew York Court of Appeals · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API