Johnson v. Morris
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1ConcurrencePhillips, Chief Judge
I agree that the application of either Federal law or the law of Kansas requires an affirmance but I deem it appropriate to state my views with respect to the applicable law.
The question is whether under the facts the appellants had an equitable lien on the assets of the bankrupt when they passed into the hands of the trustee in bankruptcy.1
Whether the appellants had an equitable lien upon the assets of Culver immediately prior to the inception of bankruptcy was a question of state law. If they did not have such a lien under state law, the event *69of bankruptcy certainly would not create such a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Taylor v. Standard Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Schuyler v. LittlefieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Prudence Realization Corp. v. GeistSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Arnold Investment Co. v. Citizens State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.