Legal Opinion

Waldrop v. Miller Moderns

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 6, 1961No. 31178PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

No question is presented here about the compensation ordered by the Deputy Commissioner to.be paid claimant; at this late stage of the litigation the claimant, the carrier and the employer are not concerned over the outcome of this review.' Nor is there any contest over the total fee for the services of claimant’s counsel. We deal only with the manner in which the fee allowed for such services has been or should be divided.

For the sake of brevity, we will refer to the injured employee as Waldrop, the petitioner-attorney as Spisak and the respondent-attorney as Schroll.

The…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gardiner v. GoertnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  2. Lopez v. Airlift International Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1972
  3. Sardella v. Champion Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API