Legal Opinion

Anthony Chaney v. Daniel Wadsworth

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 13, 2017No. 15-35892Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Anthony Chaney (“Anthony”) appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment for defendants-appel-lees in his civil action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Montana state law. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

We review de novo the district court’s grant of summary judgment. Bravo v. City of Santa Maria, 665 F.3d 1076, 1083 (9th Cir. 2011). Summary judgment is appropriate “if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a). “[T]he…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API