Legal Opinion

Holland v. Hedenstad

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 29, 1970No. 42073PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

James F. Murphy, Justice. *

This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying plaintiff’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial. Plaintiff, Mrs. Lucille Holland, sued defendants, Mr. and Mrs. Howard Hedenstad, for damages resulting from injuries she sustained when she fell on the back stairs of defendants’ house. The trial court directed a verdict for defendants after plaintiff presented her case.

Plaintiff visited defendants at their house in St. Paul on November 19, 1963. She arrived between 7 and 7:30 p. m. and entered the house by the five steps at the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sandstrom v. AAD Temple Building Assn. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  2. Thayer v. SilkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  3. Carlson v. RandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  4. Glenn v. MunsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Peterson v. BalachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  2. Dean v. WeisbrodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  3. Stapleman v. St. Joseph the WorkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API