Legal Opinion

Zentz v. Toop

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 27, 1966PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

92 N.J. Super. 105 (1966)

222 A.2d 290

JACK ZENTZ, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT,

v.

CHARLES S. TOOP AND MARION TOOP, HUSBAND AND WIFE, INDIVIDUALLY, JOINTLY AND/OR D/B/A LINCROFT SHOPPING CENTER, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS, CROSS-APPELLANTS,

v.

NATHAN SIEGEL, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT, AND FRANK CORDASCO ET AL., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued December 6, 1965.

Decided July 27, 1966.

Before Judges GAULKIN, LABRECQUE and BROWN.

Mr. Vincent D. Enright, Jr. argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant Jack…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Meistrich v. Casino Arena Attractions, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  2. McGrath v. American Cyanamid Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  3. Kulbacki v. SobchinskySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  4. Handleman v. CoxSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  5. Gudnestad v. Seaboard Coal Dock Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Dawson v. Bunker Hill Plaza AssociatesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
  2. Sanna v. National Sponge Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
  3. Vallillo v. Muskin Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
  4. Devaney v. SarnoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
  5. Piro v. Public Service Electric & Gas Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API