Legal Opinion

Seibert v. McNamara

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 6, 1990No. 73836Published

1Opinion of the Court

GRIMES, Justice.

We review McNamara v. Seibert, 537 So.2d 1009 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988), in which the Fifth District Court of Appeal, on rehearing, certified to this Court the following question of great public importance:

MAY A SURVIVOR, AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED IN THE FLORIDA WRONGFUL DEATH ACT, RECOVER FROM HIS OWN UNINSURED MOTORIST INSURANCE POLICY HIS DAMAGES WHERE THE DECEDENT IS NOT A COVERED PERSON UNDER THE POLICY?

Id. at 1010-11. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

On facts essentially the same as those in the instant case for purposes of the legal issue involved, this Court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Valiant Ins. Co. v. WebsterSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  2. McMamara v. SeibertDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API