Louis F. Kleeman Co. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from. Jackson Circuit Court.—Hon. Thos. J. Seehorn, Judge. . (1) The contract sued on is not against public policy. Royle Mining Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co., 126 Mo. App. 104, 115; London G-. & A. Co. v. Morris, 156 HI. App. 533; Breeden v. Insurance Co., 220 Mo. 327, 523. (2) The injured employee, Milo Collins, was not a child at the date of his injury and therefore appellee is liable. London G-. & A. Co. v. Morris, 156 111. App. 533.
1Opinion of the CourtEllison, P. J.
Plaintiff is a manufacturing company with a number of employees in its service. It brought this action against defendant on an indemnity insurance policy, alleging that Milo Collins was one of its employees and that he was injured in such service and afterwards recovered of plaintiff, as damages for such injuries, the sum of $1000, which it paid. The trial was by the court without the aid of a jury and judgment was rendered for defendant.
Among other conditions contained in the policy was one providing that “This policy does not cover loss arising from injuries or death . . . suffered by or…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. MorrisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1910
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Washington Brick & Terra Cotta Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1927
- Perkins v. BeckerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1942
- Gise v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Swabey v. BoyersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918
- Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Peoples Wet Wash Laundry Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.