Legal Opinion
State v. Youngblood
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided January 7, 1993No. CR-90-0053-PR, CR-89-0353-PRPublished
1Opinion of the Court
173 Ariz. 502 (1993)
844 P.2d 1152
STATE of Arizona, Appellee/Cross-Appellant,
v.
Larry YOUNGBLOOD, Appellant/Cross-Appellee,
STATE of Arizona, Appellant,
v.
Joe HERRERA-RODRIGUEZ, Appellee.
Nos. CR-90-0053-PR, CR-89-0353-PR.
Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc.
January 7, 1993.
Stephen D. Neely, Pima County Atty. by Catherine M. Shovlin, Deputy County Atty., John R. Gustafson, Sp. Deputy County Atty., Tucson, for state of Ariz. in State v. Youngblood.
Daniel F. Davis, Tucson, for Youngblood.
Grant Woods, Atty. Gen. by Joseph T. Maziarz, Asst. Atty. Gen., Phoenix, for amicus curiae Arizona Atty. Gen., in…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Concurrence.
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Yee v. City of EscondidoSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.