Legal Opinion

People v. Persons

New York Court of Special Session

Decided September 3, 1969PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas E. Goldman, J.

The defendant is charged with speeding, and the sole evidence produced by the People concerning his speed was that derived from the use of a new device known as Vascar (visual average speed computer recorder). This instrument is supposed to measure the distance a vehicle travels and the time which it takes the vehicle to cover that distance. By using the mathematical formula of speed equals distance divided by time, the unit computes the average speed of a vehicle over the distance measured and visually displays that speed to the operator.

Vascar’s accuracy and reliability has not yet been…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Buffalo v. BeckNew York Supreme Court · 1954
  2. People v. SachsNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1955
  3. City of Rochester v. Torpey, New York County Courts1953
  4. People v. Rothstein, New York County Courts1955
  5. People v. Martirano, New York County Courts1966

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. FinkleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  2. State v. SchmiedeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
  3. City of St. Louis v. MartinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Commonwealth v. SmolowSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Commonwealth v. Koenig, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API