Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Frierson
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, P. J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) There are only two propositions insisted on by the plaintiff in error. One is that it appears from the petition as amended that the plaintiff, when he received the injuries alleged, was engaged in interstate commerce and that whatever right to a recovery he may have is determinable by the Federal employer’s liability act. The other is that it appears from the allegations of the petition as amended that the plaintiff, in using the motor car with knowledge that the brakes were defective as alleged, assumed the risk incident to the defective condition of the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. HarringtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Southern Railway Co. v. HeatonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. CrappsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
- SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. SmalleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. SmalleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965