Legal Opinion

Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. v. Coratomic, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 17, 1983No. 82-1513PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. (CPI), brought this action for a declaratory judgment against Coratomic, Inc. The ease involves three patents on surgically implantable heart pacemakers owned by Coratomic. The District Court, 1 in a full but unpublished opinion, held that the three patents— No. 3,866,616, No. 3,987,799 (which later became Reissue Patent No. 30,028), and Design Patent No. 241,980 — were invalid for obviousness. Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. v. Coratomic, Inc., 535 F.Supp. 280 (D.Minn. 1982). It further held the design patent invalid on the alternative ground that its design was dictated…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. v. Coratomic, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Land Office Co. v. Clapp-Thomssen Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Tol-O-Matic, Inc. v. Proma Produkt-Und Marketing Gesellschaft, M.B.H.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1987
  3. Ex Parte Atlantis Development Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  4. Ex Parte Atlantis Development Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  5. Land Office Co. v. Clapp-Thomssen Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API