Brigham v. United States
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
McGLYNN, District Judge.
This is an action for the refund of Federal Income Taxes in the amount of $9,971.00 paid for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1966. In its amended answer, the defendant sets forth an offset defense.
It is the conclusion of this court that the defendant’s offset defense is invalid and, therefore, the plaintiffs are entitled to judgment for the amount of the refund.
For the purpose of resolving this dispute, the parties have stipulated to the following facts. In 1965, Numar S.A. (hereinafter “Numar”), a corporation organized under the law of Costa…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Richard T. Brigham and Margaret H. Brigham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976