Hoyt v. Fixico
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Creek County; Ernest B. Hughes. Judge. Action to quiet title by E. W. Kimbley, as guardian of Katie Fixico, against E. H. Hoyt and I-I. E. Denton and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants named bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtHardy, J.
E. IV. Kibley, as guardian of Katie Fixico, a full-blood Creek Indian, instituted this action against E. H. Hoyt and H. R. Denton, the Carpathia Petroleum Company, and the Mid-Co Petroleum Company, to quiet her title to certain lands which she had inherited from her brother, Benoche Fixico. By an amended petition she prayed that the right and title of the Carpathia Petroleum Company and the Mid-Co Petroleum Company be quieted in them respectively. Judgment was for plaintiff, and Hoyt and Denton prosecute error.
On March 2, 1912, William P. Morton, as guardian of Katie Fixico, executed an oil…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. NobleSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Welch v. FochtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Moffer v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Brennan v. HunterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Cabin Valley Mining Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Rich v. DonegheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Winona Oil Co. v. BarnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Garfield Oil Co. v. ChamplinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Brunson v. Carter Oil Co.District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1919
- Pluto Oil & Gas Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.