Legal Opinion
State v. Lanik
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided February 6, 2013No. 26192, 26224PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as State v. Lanik,
2013-Ohio-361.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) STATE OF OHIO C.A. No. 26192 26224 Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT BUNNY L. LANIK ENTERED IN THE DANNY A. HAMBY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COUNTY OF SUMMIT, OHIO Appellants CASE No. CR 11 02 0519 (B) CR 11 02 0519 (C) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY Dated: February 6, 2013 MOORE, Judge. {¶1} Appellants, Danny Hamby and Bunny Lynn Lanik, appeal from their convictions in the Summit County Court of Common Pleas. We affirm. I. {¶2} In February of 2011, police officers were…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. OttenOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
- Jordan v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. HayesOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. YatsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- State v. ThomasOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. KuscsikOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. OdenOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.