Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Sanders

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 24, 1951No. 12361PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Justice.

This is an original proceeding brought under Article 1824, T.R.C.S., Vernon’s Ann. Civ.St. art. 1824, seeking a writ of mandamus ordering the Hon. P. C. Sanders, District Judge, and others to proceed with the trial of a case which by the trial court’s order has been abated pending the trial of another suit that was filed earlier. Both suits are pending in the same -court. The nature and history of the two actions will be briefly summarized.

First suit: Leonard Hyatt sued William E. Hughes, the Mercury Life and Health Company, and others, and alleged that on July 28, 1944, they…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cleveland v. WardTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Benson v. FulmoreTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  3. McCurdy v. GageTexas Commission of Appeals · 1934
  4. North Texas Coach Co. v. MortenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. Landa v. IsernTexas Supreme Court · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mercury Life & Health Company v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  2. McFarling v. LaphamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  3. MacWhyte Co. v. Gonzalez, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1985
  4. MacWhyte Co. v. Gonzalez, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1985
  5. McFarling v. LaphamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API