Legal Opinion

Younie v. Sheek

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1927No. 4608PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.

Respondent, owner of four fractional lots bounded by the west meander line of Snake River, brought this action for the purpose of enjoining appellants from occupying certain lands lying between the government west meander line and Snake River, on which appellants had filed possessory claims in 1923. The appeal is from a judgment for respondent and an order denying a motion for a new trial.

The evidence showed that the bulb of the land in question lay between a so-called west channel of the river (see Defendant’s Exhibit 4), varying in width from 100 to 300 feet and from 3 to 8 feet in depth,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Scott v. LattigSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Producers Oil Co. v. HanzenSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Johnson v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Security Land & Exploration Co. v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. Johnson v. HurstIdaho Supreme Court · 1904

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Heckman Ranches, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Department of Public LandsIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Smith v. LongIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Houser v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
  4. Stafford v. FieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Brown v. GrahamIdaho Supreme Court · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API