Legal Opinion
Wynn v. Avemco Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 14, 1998No. 89403PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HODGES, Justice.
¶ 1 The issue before this Court is whether the trial court properly granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant insurance company. We find that summary judgment was improper because a genuine issue of material fact exists.
I. FACTS
¶2 Ralph Wynn, owner of a 1972 Piper Warrior, alleges that he requested “full coverage” when he first applied for insurance with Avemco Insurance Company (Avemco). Wynn submitted a renewal application of the policy for a period from July 28, 1993 until July 28, 1994. The application seeks coverage for liability for bodily injury and property…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dodson v. St. Paul Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Wiley v. Travelers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- James v. Federal Insurance Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Government Employees Insurance Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Martin v. Chapel, Wilkinson, Riggs, and AbneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Reeds v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Edens v. Netherlands InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Haberman v. Hartford Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- BP America, Inc. v. State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- American Economy Insurance Co. v. BogdahnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.