Legal Opinion

Florida Bar re Dunagan

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 30, 2000No. SC95720PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

We have for review the referee’s report recommending that Walter Benton Duna-gan not be reinstated to the practice of law at this time, but that if he is reinstated he be placed under supervision. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 15, Fla. Const. For the reasons explained herein, we reinstate Dunagan with the condition that he serve a probationary period of one year.

In February 1999, Dunagan was suspended from the practice of law for ninety-one days. See Florida Bar v. Dunagan, 731 So.2d 1237 (Fla.1999). The suspension arose out of Dunagan’s representation of William Leucht against his wife,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. DunaganSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  2. The Florida Bar v. LechtnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  3. Florida Bar re GrusmarkSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  4. Florida Bar re JanssenSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
  5. Florida BarSupreme Court of Florida · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. Jeremy W. AltersSupreme Court of Florida · 2018
  2. Florida Bar ex rel. McGrawSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  3. The Florida Bar Re: Brian John MurthaSupreme Court of Florida · 2021
  4. The Florida Bar re: Norwood Sherman WilnerSupreme Court of Florida · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API