State Of Iowa Vs. Jason Allen Wing
Supreme Court of Iowa
1DissentCady, Justice
I respectfully dissent. Statutes and rules must only be applied to circumstances intended to be within their purview. The speedy-trial rule was never intended to apply when a person is detained by police at a roadside encounter for suspected criminal conduct but released at the scene without being told he was under arrest, without being transported to the police station for processing and appearance before a magistrate, without being charged with a criminal offense, without being subjected to the other processes of the prosecution of a crime, and without any disruption and burden associated…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. MaysCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Victor Varella, Charles Gavin and Raul Felix ChineaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- John A. Hilbert, III v. The Honorable John F. Dooling, Jr., in His Capacity as United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.