Legal Opinion

City of Clinton v. County of Clinton

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 9, 1883PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Clinton Circuit Cou/rt. Action to recover for expenses alleged to have been incurred in providing for certain persons infected with smallpox, and in providing for the safety of the inhabitants. There was a trial to the court, and judgment was rendered for-the plaintiff. The defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

i. pauper: ISnhavhigSo liability of' care of. — One of the persons provided for was one Christina Shutt, who, at the time she was taken sick with small-pox, had come to Clinton a few days before, with the intention of making that city her home, She was a native of Denmark, and had not gained a settlement elsewhere. The statute upon which *206the plaintiff relies, (sections 21 and 22, chapter 151 of the Laws of the Eighteenth General Assembly; McClain’s Statutes, 455), provides, where relief is furnished as in this case, for charging the county to which the sick or infected person belongs.

The…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lacy v. County of KossuthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  2. Village of St. Johns v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Staples v. Plymouth CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  4. Brock v. Jones CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  5. Dodge County v. DiersNebraska Supreme Court · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API