Legal Opinion

Langer v. Euclid Avenue, LLC

District Court, S.D. California

Decided August 22, 2022No. 3:19-cv-02384Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 CHRIS LANGER, Case No.: 19-CV-2384 DMS (DDL) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR 12 v. DEFAULT JUDGMENT 13 EUCLID AVENUE, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, and PHILLIP’S 14 APPLIANCES INC, a California 15 Corporation, and Does 1-10, 16 Defendants. 17 18 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment against 19 Defendants Euclid Avenue, LLC and Phillip’s Appliances Inc. The motion is unopposed. 20 Upon consideration of the pleadings, the motion, and the Defendants’ lack of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Televideo Systems, Inc. K. Philip Hwang C. Gemma Hwang v. Fred P. Heidenthal, Individually and Dba South Harbor Investors and West Cliff SecuritiesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. Pepsico, Inc. v. California Security CansDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
  5. Molski v. M.J. Cable, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API