Legal Opinion

People v. Sugarman

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 1928PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPound, J.

The indictment charges defendant with forgery, second degree, in two counts, i. e., one, that defendant, having in his possession a check for $25,000, dated June 26, 1919, made by S. Barkin payable to the order of George P. Smith, forged the indorsement of the name of the payee on the back thereof, and another, that he uttered the same.

Smith, whose signature defendant is charged with having forged, was a young man, somewhat under thirty years of age at the time of the transaction complained of. He had had business transactions with defendant, who was a lawyer. He had indorsed and made notes…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. The People v. . ColeNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. People v. . StrolloNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  4. People v. . BromwichNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. People v. TildenIllinois Supreme Court · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. MATTER OF UNITED PRESS ASSNS. v. ValenteNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. People v. La BarberaNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Nolan v. Court of General SessionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
  4. In re the Estate of MezgerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
  5. United States v. MalinskyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API