Suggs v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1ConcurrenceWarner, J.
I concur in the denial of the request for rehearing en banc by the appellant. He suggests that the majority decision in this case conflicts with Cruz v. State, 956 So.2d 1279, 1282 n. 4 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007), where in a footnote we said, quoting State v. Mitchell, 719 So.2d 1245, 1248 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998):
The GrappinfWatts test is drawn from two decisions, Grappin v. State, 450 So.2d 480 (Fla.1984), and State v. Watts, 462 So.2d 813 (Fla.1985), and stands
for the proposition that when a question arises regarding the unit of prosecution intended by the legislature in a particular criminal statute,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bautista v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
- Grappin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- State v. WattsSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- State v. MitchellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Cruz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007