Spring v. Nagle
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
The first ground of appeal is from the denial by the trial court of the plaintiffs’ motion that the verdict be set aside because contrary to the evidence. The plaintiffs claimed that under the evidence as to the relations between the parties, prior to- the entering into of the written agreements hereinafter set forth, it could not reasonably be found otherwise than that the defendant had impliedly contracted with the plaintiffs to undertake, as brokers, to procure a purchaser for her home in Hartford.
The defendant claimed and offered evidence to prove, that she never actually so employed the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Aaronson v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Callahan v. JursekSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Kost v. ReillySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1892
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gordon v. Bridgeport Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Olson v. PenkertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Revere Real Estate, Inc. v. CeratoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Moore v. Waterbury Tool Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Stagg v. LawtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.