Legal Opinion

Lyon & Healy v. Walldren

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 30, 1916No. Gen. No. 22,351PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John Stelic, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1916.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holdom

This is an appeal from a judgment in an action of replevin for a so-called ‘ Sheraton piano” in favor of defendant and awarding a writ of retorno habendo for the return of the piano to defendant, from whom it was taken by plaintiff under the writ of replevin issued in the action.

The cause was submitted to the court for trial without a jury, who entered the judgment appealed from at the conclusion of plaintiff’s case. In this condition of the record the only question presented for our decision is: Did plaintiff make out a prima facie case on which a finding in its favor, if made, could have…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harkness v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Gilbert v. National Cash Register Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Hacker v. Munroe & SonIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Emerson Piano Co. v. MaundAppellate Court of Illinois · 1899
  5. W. W. Kimball Co. v. CruikshankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1905

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. Four Thousand Eight Hundred Fifty DollarsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  2. Dayton Scale Co. v. General Market House Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1928
  3. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. RoederAppellate Court of Illinois · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API