Legal Opinion

Cherry v. Singer Sewing Machine Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 4, 1932No. 13401PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Bonham.

Fred Cherry and Lucile S. Cherry, his wife, brought action in the County Court of Orangeburg .County demanding damages for the alleged unlawful seizure and conversion of a sewing machine, then in the possession of Lucile S. Cherry. After trial of the case Fred Cherry died. Lucile Cherry was appointed administratrix of his estate, and by proper order was, as such administratrix, substituted in his stead.

The action was brought against Singer Sewing Machine Company and S. L. Dantzler. The complaint alleged that on the 19th day of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Atlantic Coast Line R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  2. Jenkins v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
  3. Sparks v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1916
  4. Weeks v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  5. Jones v. Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kirby v. Gulf Refining Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
  2. Mullikin v. Southern Bleachery & Print WorksSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
  3. Chapman-Storm Lumber Corp. v. Minnesota-South Carolina Land & Timber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
  4. Collins v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  5. Thomas v. Southern Grocery Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API