Legal Opinion

David Franklin Clay v. James A. Lynaugh, Director, Texas Department of Corrections

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 30, 1988No. 87-1521PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

David Franklin Clay, a prisoner in the custody of the Texas Department of Corrections, sought a writ of habeas corpus in federal court on the ground that his conviction for aggravated rape violated the due process clause of the United States Constitution. In December, 1977, a Texas jury convicted Clay of aggravated kidnapping and aggravated rape. Clay charged that, because the two offenses arose out of a single criminal transaction, the second conviction, for aggravated rape, was illegal under the Texas “carving doctrine,” a judicially developed rule that protected some criminal defendants…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte McWilliamsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  2. David Franklin Clay v. James A. Lynaugh, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Clay v. LynaughCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API