Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. State

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1897PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On error to the Middlesex Quarter Sessions.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Yah Syckel, J.

The plaintiff in error, who is an attorney-at-law, was convicted in the Middlesex Quarter Sessions of obtaining money from one Ellen Burke by falsely pretending that he had instituted and was conducting a suit in her behalf in which he would recover for her a large amount. He obtained the money from her in various sums, from time to time, by pretending that they were necessary in the prosecution of the suit.

The indictment charges, in substance, as follows:

“ That the defendant, being * * * an, attorney-at-law, * * * did talsely pretend to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McCord v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. People v. HerrickNew York Supreme Court · 1834

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MellenbergerOregon Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Lovell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905
  3. Netter v. ReggioLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1905
  4. State ex rel. Szabary v. Recorder of MortgagesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API