Legal Opinion

State v. Lucero

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1982No. 13922PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RIORDAN, Justice.

Dorothy Lucero (Defendant) was convicted of child abuse. § 30-6-l(C), N.M.S.A. 1978 (Cum.Supp.1981). She appealed alleging that the child abuse statute was unconstitutional and that the trial court erroneously excluded testimony by Defendant’s expert witness, Dr. Salazar, on the issue of duress. The Court of Appeals held the statute constitutional, but reversed Defendant’s conviction, and granted her a new trial because of the exclusion of the expert witness’ testimony. We granted certiorari, and we affirm in part and reverse in part.

We affirm the Court of Appeals in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. James Castle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
  2. Esquibel v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  4. State v. LuceroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. State v. StarksArizona Supreme Court · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Santillanes v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. HarrisonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. State v. GuruleNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. State v. NozieNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Perez v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API