Legal Opinion

Borcheck v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 22, 2000No. 5D99-3010PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

This action was brought by Michael Bor-check [“Borcheck”] against his no-fault insurance carrier, State Farm Automobile Insurance Company [“State Farm”], to recover payment of medical claims and lost income as a result of his involvement in a collision on December 1, 1996. Specifically, he alleged that State Farm wrongfully failed to pay his medical claim for shoulder surgery in August 1997, in the amount of $31,319.80.

State Farm answered, denying Bor-check’s allegations and asserting, inter alia, the affirmative defense that Borcheck failed to “establish the medical necessity, reasonableness…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Angelucci v. Government Employees InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API