American Casualty Co. v. Senecal
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.
The policy which is the subject matter of this action was obviously designed primarily to afford protection against liabilities which might arise out of the operation of a filling station *264or garage, including risks from the operation of automobiles in the course of the business, whether such automobiles should be owned by the insured or not.
Since such coverage would necessarily include insurance against risks arising from the ownership and use of the insured’s own vehicles, the insuring provisions were also made sufficiently comprehensive to cover “occasional use for other business purposes…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Landis Ex Rel. Talley v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1952
- Culver v. WebbWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
- Traders & General Insurance v. Pioneer Mutual Compensation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1953
3Cited by2 opinions
- Keenan v. WactorLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
- Wescott v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971