Sutton v. Bank of Oglethorpe
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
1. The rule that the burden of proving that one is a laborer lies upon the one asserting a laborer’s lien does not apply where a judgment foreclosing a laborer’s lien is collaterally attacked by a stranger.
2. Where two judgment creditors are contending for a fund upon a money *417rule against the levying officer, and the claim of one of the judgment creditors is based upon a judgment foreclosing a laborer’s lien, and where the former flies a traverse denying that the one who had asserted the laborer’s lien was a laborer, the burden of proof, if a traverse lies in such a proceeding, is upon the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Oliver v. Macon Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1896
- Baisden & Co. v. Holmes-Hartsfield Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908