Legal Opinion

Sutton v. Bank of Oglethorpe

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 11, 1925No. 15475Published

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. The rule that the burden of proving that one is a laborer lies upon the one asserting a laborer’s lien does not apply where a judgment foreclosing a laborer’s lien is collaterally attacked by a stranger.

2. Where two judgment creditors are contending for a fund upon a money *417rule against the levying officer, and the claim of one of the judgment creditors is based upon a judgment foreclosing a laborer’s lien, and where the former flies a traverse denying that the one who had asserted the laborer’s lien was a laborer, the burden of proof, if a traverse lies in such a proceeding, is upon the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Oliver v. Macon Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  2. Baisden & Co. v. Holmes-Hartsfield Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API