Legal Opinion

Geddes v. Broman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 3, 1941No. 32,785PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pek Curiam.

Respondent moves to dismiss the appeal for want of a proper bond. Appellant asks the court to be allowed to file another bond and for leave to submit this appeal upon the record and briefs served and filed in the appeal from the order denying appellant a new trial.

The judgment appealed from was rendered May 25, 1940, and the time to appeal therefrom expired November 25, 1940, the day of the hearing of the appeal from the order denying a new trial. On such hearing respondent moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that it was not taken within 30 days after service of notice of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Union Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  2. Sworski v. ColmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  3. Geddes v. BromanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of GelinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  2. Mixed Local of Hotel & Restaurant Employees Union, Local No. 458 v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees International AllianceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  3. M. L. H. and R. E. U. L. No. 458 v. H. R. E. I. A.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API