Legal Opinion

Cassidy v. Aroostook Hotels, Inc.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 17, 1936PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHudson, J.

This is an action, of debt, based ón Section 28 of Chapter 14, R. S. 1930, to enforce a real estate tax lien on the “Snell House Lot” in Houlton. By agreement, hearing was had by a single Justice without intervention of a jury. His decision was: “Entry may be judgment for plaintiff for one thousand three hundred fifty-five ($1,355.00) dollars. No judgment against real estate specially attached.”

The plaintiff, his lien claim denied (and it was. of vital importance to him because of prior incumbrances), presents to this Court four exceptions to rulings of the Trial Court, viz.:

1. “That the list…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Collector of Taxes v. Revere Building, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  2. City of Rockland v. UlmerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1892
  3. City of Rockland v. FarnsworthSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1913
  4. Inhabitants of Bucksport v. SwazeySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1933
  5. Hayden v. FosterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1833

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Town of PittsfieldDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1969
  2. Finance Authority v. City of CaribouSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API