People v. Brown
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELKINGTON, Acting P. J.
Defendant Brown’s appeal is from a judgment founded upon a jury’s finding him guilty of grand theft.
One of his appellate arguments is that “the evidence is insufficient to support a finding of guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.”
On such a contention we are bound by In re Roderick P. (1972) 7 Cal.3d 801, 808 [103 Cal.Rptr. 425, 500 P.2d 1], as follows: “It is the function of this court in reviewing a criminal conviction on appeal to determine whether the record contains any substantial evidence tending to support the finding of the trier of fact, and in considering…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. HitchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. ZamoraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Grainger v. AntoyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. TalamantezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- County of Ventura v. GeorgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- People v. GonzalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- El Pueblo de Puerto Rico v. Ayala GarcíaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2005
- El Pueblo De Puerto Rico v. Gerardo Ayala GarcíaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.