Legal Opinion
Atlantic Steel Company v. McLarty
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided October 3, 1946No. 31344PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
It is the contention of the plaintiff in error that the testimony of the claimant to the effect that his loss of vision began immediately after the accident of April 25, 1945, did no more than raise an inference that such loss of vision was due to the accident, and that this inference was conclusively rebutted and must yield to the direct testimony of the physician that the burns which the claimant sustained at that time did not injure the eye itself in any way, and that his blindness resulted from a detachment of the retina brought about by the progressive contraction of the old scar. The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Southern Railway Co. v. TankersleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Hall v. General Accident Assurance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
- City of Atlanta v. ChampeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881
- Southern Railway Co. v. PetwayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
- Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ballenger v. Southern Worsted Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1946
- White v. Valley Land CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
- Department of Revenue v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Autry v. General Motors Bop Assembly PlantCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Fidelity and Casualty Co. of New York v. TreadwellTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.