Winchel v. Craig
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1DissentJudith Rogers, Judge
I am in agreement with appellant’s argument that the circuit court lacked jurisdiction to afford equitable relief. Therefore, I respectfully dissent to the majority’s decision rejecting appellant’s argument.
The issue of which court, law or equity, has jurisdiction to grant the relief known as “piercing the corporate veil” is one of first impression. The majority relies, in part, on the decision of Black and White, Inc. v. Love, 236 Ark. 529, 367 S.W.2d 427 (1963), where the supreme court, upon review of a circuit court case, found no error in the admission of evidence or an instruction…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Monette Road Improvement District v. DudleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
- Banks v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
- Black & White, Inc. v. LoveSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
- Humphries v. BrayCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1981
- Commission on Judicial Discipline & Disability v. DigbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.