Legal Opinion

Smith v. Bynum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 26, 1999PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (D’Emilio, J.), dated April 14, 1998, which denied their motion pursuant to CPLR 3126 to strike the defendants’ answer for failure to appear for depositions.

*627Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

It is well established that the drastic remedy of striking an answer is inappropriate absent a clear showing that the failure to comply with discovery is willful, contumacious, or in bad faith (see, CPLR 3126; Olmoz v Town of Fishkill, 258…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Watson v. FHE Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Selamaj v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Segarra v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API