Cason v. State

1. Under all the facts shown on the motion to continue this ease, this court cannot say, as a matter of law, that the trial judge abused his discretion in refusing to continue the case.

2. “ ‘ It is not a matter of right for the accused to make a second statement to the court and jury because the State has introduced additional evidence which strengthens the case against him.’ Boston v. State, 94 Ga. 590 (21 S. E. 603); Knox v. State, 112 Ga. 373 (37 S. E. 416). Whether he should be allowed to supplement his first statement with another is discretionary with' the trial court. Dixon v. State,…