Legal Opinion

Surette v. Brantley

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 7, 1986No. 84-763PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOUSTON, Justice.

The sole issue in this case is whether the trial court’s refusal to grant Agnes W. Surette’s Rule 60(b), Ala.R.Civ.P., motion was an abuse of discretion.

On October 19, 1984, Enoch L. Brantley’s motion for summary judgment was granted and judgment was entered against Ms. Sur-ette in the amount of $22,601.96. On December 4, 1984, Ms. Surette filed her Rule 60(b) motion. The trial court heard the motion on February 21, 1985, and denied the motion to set aside the judgment. Ms. Surette appeals. We affirm.

Rule 60(b), Ala.R.Civ.P., is an extreme remedy to be used only under…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Daphne v. CaffeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Maddox v. Druid City Hospital Bd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  3. Am. Home Assur. Co. v. HardySupreme Court of Alabama · 1979

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hall v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Ex Parte Illinois Cent. Gulf R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. Horton ex rel. Wiginton v. Illinois Central Gulf RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  4. New Image Industries, Inc. v. RiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  5. Horton ex rel. Wiginton v. Illinois Central Gulf RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API